From Down Under to Your Door: Australia’s New Social Media Law and What’s Brewing in the U.S. and South Carolina

Field Dunaway • December 10, 2025

The ripple effect of Australia’s new rules on pending federal and South Carolina social media legislation.

In November 2024, Australia passed the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024, which amends the federal Online Safety Act 2021. The new rules came into force on December 10, 2025. 


From that date, social media platforms are legally required to block Australians under 16 from having social media accounts (with some nuances around “age-restricted social media platforms”).


What Kind of Law is It?


It’s primarily:


  • A federal statute (Commonwealth Parliament) – the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024.
  • It inserts a new Part 4A – “Social media minimum age” into the existing Online Safety Act 2021. 
  • It’s enforced by the eSafety Commissioner, a national regulator with powers to issue directions and civil penalties. 


Separately, Australia is also developing a Children’s Online Privacy Code under privacy law, modeled on the UK’s Age-Appropriate Design Code, but that’s about data/privacy design obligations, not an outright ban. 


So you can think of it as:


Online safety law → sets a minimum age (16) and platform responsibilities

Privacy / design code (coming) → governs how services handle kids’ data and design features 



Key Parts Summarized


Mandatory minimum age: 16



  • The law defines an “age-restricted user” as an Australian child under 16. 
  • “Age-restricted social media platforms” must take reasonable steps to prevent these users from:
  • Creating new accounts, and
  • Keeping existing accounts. 


So it’s not just “no sign-ups” – platforms are supposed to identify and remove under-16 accounts that already exist. 



Which platforms are covered?


The law targets major social media platforms that:


  • Have large user bases in Australia and
  • Have features for sharing content, connecting with others, following/being followed, etc. 


In practice, the government and coverage list:


  • Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, Reddit, X (Twitter), Threads, Twitch, Kick and similar services. 


Some services with social features (e.g., games, chat inside apps) may also count if they meet the definition.



What platforms must do.


The amended Act and government fact sheet say platforms must: 


  • Prevent under-16s from having accounts
  • Deactivate or remove existing under-16 accounts
  • Block new under-16 sign-ups
  • Use age-assurance / age-verification measures beyond simple “enter your birthday”:
  • Age-estimation based on video selfies or facial analysis
  • Analysis of behavior / account data
  • Optional ID or bank-linked checks (but they can’t mandate government ID as the only route) 
  • Not rely solely on parental consent; parents cannot override the ban for their under-16 child. 


They can still let kids browse some content logged-out (e.g., watching videos without an account), but no posting, commenting, DMs, or personalized feeds via an account. 



Penalties


The eSafety Commissioner is responsible for ensuring organizations comply with age-assurance requirements and can request data on these systems, issue enforcement notices, and seek civil penalties. Serious or systemic non-compliance can attract heavy penalties of up to A$49.5 million (about US$33 million) or a percentage of a company’s global turnover.



Is the U.S. Next? What’s Happening Here in the U.S. & South Carolina


Here’s a combined, up-to-date synopsis of what someone living in South Carolina should know about active or recently proposed laws — both federal and SC-state — that would affect minors’ use of social media and online services. It includes what’s already law and what’s still “in play.”




What's Going on in D.C. (Federal-Level)


The list of current pending bills as of 12/10/25 which have the potential for becoming U.S. laws relating to age restrictions on social media are outlined below.


Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA)


  • This bill was re-introduced in the Senate in May 2025. (Congress.gov)
  • It would require online platforms — including social media, streaming, messaging, etc. — to implement protections for minors under 17: safer default settings, privacy protections, parental-control tools, less harmful content, restrictions on algorithmic “engagement boosting,” and reporting mechanisms. (Congress.gov)
  • As of December 2025, KOSA has not become law. It is pending further consideration (the House has not passed final legislation).


Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act 2.0 (COPPA 2.0)


  • Introduced by U.S. Senators in 2025 to update the older federal privacy law. (U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy)
  • If enacted, it would extend protections beyond under-13 children to include adolescents (up to age 16 or 17): internet companies would be barred from collecting their personal information without consent, would have to allow deletion of that information (“eraser button”), ban targeted advertising to minors, and set stricter data-minimization standards. (Ed Markey)
  • The Senate passed this legislation (as part of a broader youth-online-safety package) by a wide margin (91–3). (Chuck Grassley)
  • As of now, COPPA 2.0 remains pending final approval in Congress / the House. (Ed Markey)




What’s Going On in South Carolina (State-Level)


South Carolina Social Media Regulation Act (H. 3431, 2025-2026 session)


  • This bill was introduced Jan 2025, passed the SC Senate on May 6, 2025 (unanimous vote) after amendments, and was sent back to the House for consideration. (South Carolina Legislature Online)
  • If enacted, it would amend SC law to require social-media companies to verify the age of South Carolina account-holders, and forbid minors (without express parental consent) from being account holders. (South Carolina Legislature Online)
  • It also includes: restrictions on advertising and data collection for minors; limitations on features that encourage excessive or compulsive use; requirements for parental-controls, transparency, and reporting mechanisms; and enforcement power for the state’s consumer-services division. (South Carolina Legislature Online)
  • If approved by the House and signed by the governor, the law would take effect 90 days after approval. (South Carolina Legislature Online)
  • Status: Passed Senate → pending in House (not yet law). (South Carolina Legislature Online)





Recap - What You Should Know


  • There is no SC-state or federal law in force yet that universally bans minors from social media or fully regulates age-verification / account-restrictions.
  • At the federal level, two major bills — KOSA (safety protections) and COPPA 2.0 (privacy/data protections) — have passed the Senate, but still must clear the House before becoming law.
  • In South Carolina, H. 3431 (the Social Media Regulation Act) has made substantial progress: it passed the Senate unanimously and is under consideration in the House. If approved and signed, it would impose age-verification requirements and parental-consent/account-restriction rules for minors in SC.
  • Bottom line for you (in SC): We are at a pivotal moment — important new regulations may become law in the near future, but as of now, most of these protections remain proposals.


Both federally and in South Carolina, several major proposals aimed at regulating minors’ access to social media and strengthening online-safety and privacy rules are moving — but none are fully enacted yet. Federally, KOSA and COPPA 2.0 have momentum after clearing the Senate, and in South Carolina the Social Media Regulation Act (H.3431) has already passed the Senate and is now waiting in the House. Any of these could still become law, meaning the next year will be important for families, schools, platforms, and policymakers.




What to Expect if These Become Law


If these state or federal measures pass, the United States will almost certainly see immediate legal challenges, especially around age-verification, First Amendment rights, parental-rights questions, and concerns about adult privacy. This pattern is predictable: in the last two years, nearly every state law involving social-media age verification or youth restrictions was sued and several were blocked by federal courts on constitutional grounds. The same arguments — restraint on lawful speech, burdens on anonymous expression, and overbroad restrictions on minors — would likely be raised again.




The Bottom Line


For South Carolina residents, the landscape is shifting but not settled. Big changes could arrive soon, but they will almost certainly be followed by courtroom battles and appeals. The key takeaway is simply this: keep watching. Both SC leaders and Congress are signaling strong interest in regulating youth social-media use — but the real outcome will depend not only on what passes, but on what survives the legal challenges that always follow laws in this space.


By Field Dunaway • September 30, 2026
Injured in an assault in SC? The state's Crime Victim Compensation Fund may cover medical bills, counseling & lost wages. Learn who qualifies & how to apply.
By Field Dunaway • September 14, 2026
You slip on a wet floor at the grocery store. You trip over a broken step at a friend's house. A neighbor's dog bites your kid. The first thing most people hear afterward is some version of "well, that's just an accident." Sometimes it is. But South Carolina law puts real duties on the people who own and control property, and when they ignore those duties and someone gets hurt, that's not an accident. That's a premises liability claim. Here's how it works, whether the property belongs to a business or a private homeowner. The property owner's duty depends on why you were there: South Carolina sorts visitors into three categories, and the owner's obligation changes with each one. Invitees are people on the property for the owner's benefit, usually customers. If you're shopping at Walmart, eating at a restaurant on Main Street, or walking through a hotel lobby, you're an invitee. The owner owes you the highest duty: they have to keep the property reasonably safe, inspect for hazards, and fix or warn about dangers they knew or should have known about. That "should have known" language matters. A store can't just say "nobody told us about the spill." Licensees are social guests, people there with permission but for their own purposes. That's you at your buddy's cookout or your in-laws' house for Thanksgiving. A homeowner owes a licensee a duty to warn about hidden dangers the homeowner actually knows about. If they know the back deck railing is loose and don't say anything, they've got a problem. If they had no idea, the analysis gets harder. Trespassers get the least protection. An owner generally only has to avoid willful or wanton harm to an adult trespasser. Children are a different story. Under what courts call the attractive nuisance doctrine, an owner who keeps something a child is likely to wander toward (a pool, an old refrigerator, construction equipment) can be liable even if the child had no permission to be there. Figuring out which category applies is the first thing we do on every premises case, because it sets the standard the owner is held to. What this means for businesses: Businesses in Upstate South Carolina deal with the public all day, which means they deal with invitees all day. The most common claims we see against commercial property owners involve slip and falls from spills, freshly mopped floors with no warning signs, or leaks in the produce section; parking lot hazards like potholes, poor lighting, and broken curbs; falling merchandise from overstocked shelves; stairs and walkways with broken handrails or uneven surfaces; and negligent security in places like apartment complexes, bars, and parking decks where the owner knew about prior crime and did nothing. The fight in most of these cases is about notice. To win a slip and fall in South Carolina, you generally have to show the business either created the hazard, knew about it, or that it existed long enough that a reasonable business should have found it. That's why we send preservation letters fast. Surveillance footage, incident reports, and sweep logs tend to disappear if nobody asks for them. What this means for homeowners: Homeowners are surprised to learn they can be sued for a guest's injury. But in practice, the claim is usually made against the homeowner's insurance policy, not against the homeowner personally. Most standard homeowner's policies carry liability coverage, often $100,000 to $300,000, precisely for this situation. Common homeowner premises claims include dog bites, falls on stairs, decks, or icy walkways, swimming pool injuries, and injuries from unmaintained structures like rotted porches or collapsing sheds. Dog bites deserve their own mention. South Carolina has one of the more favorable dog bite laws in the country for injured people. Under S.C. Code § 47-3-110, a dog owner is strictly liable when their dog bites or attacks someone who is in a public place or lawfully on private property. You don't have to prove the dog was vicious before, and you don't have to prove the owner was careless. The main defense is that the injured person provoked the dog or was trespassing. When the government owns the property: Falls at the courthouse, on a county sidewalk, or in a public park fall under the South Carolina Tort Claims Act. These cases have shorter deadlines and damage caps, and the procedure is unforgiving. If you were hurt on public property, do not wait to talk to a lawyer. The clock on these cases runs faster than people think. "But I should have been watching where I was going": Insurance adjusters love this line. South Carolina uses a modified comparative negligence rule: your recovery is reduced by your share of fault, and you're barred from recovering only if you're 51% or more at fault. Being partly responsible does not kill your case. It's a negotiation point, and the adjuster is going to try to inflate it. Don't give a recorded statement before you've talked to someone who represents you. What to do if you've been injured on someone's property: Get medical care first. Then, if you can, take photos of the hazard before it gets cleaned up or fixed. Report the incident to the owner or manager and ask for a copy of any incident report. Get names and phone numbers of anyone who saw what happened. Keep the shoes and clothes you were wearing. And don't sign anything or accept a quick payment from an insurance company until you understand what your case is worth. In South Carolina, you generally have three years from the date of injury to file a premises liability lawsuit. Three years sounds like a long time. It isn't, especially when evidence disappears within days. Talk to a premises liability lawyer in Anderson: Dunaway Law Firm has handled premises liability cases across Anderson County and the Upstate, from slip and falls at big-box retailers to dog bites in residential neighborhoods. We know the notice arguments, we know the insurance carriers, and we know how to move fast on preserving evidence. If you were hurt on someone else's property, call us for a free consultation. There's no fee unless we win . Call 864-224-1144 They have insurance. You have us!
Traffic during commuting hours on a interstate.
By Ashlee Edwards Aughtry • July 8, 2026
New 2024 data reveals the deadliest hour, day, and months to drive — plus South Carolina crash trends and what they mean for injured victims and their families.
The Supreme Court will hear a case testing caregiver accountability for ignoring medical needs.
By Ashlee Edwards Aughtry • June 25, 2026
The Supreme Court will hear a case testing caregivers accountability for ignoring medical needs, with implications for medical-malpractice & nursing-home patients.
By Field Dunaway • June 15, 2026
Why a Smaller Firm Can Get You a Bigger Check
By Field Dunaway • May 8, 2026
Call Dunaway Law Firm, LLC - It's FREE
By Field Dunaway • April 27, 2026
Record Insurance Profits, Record Lowball Offers 
By Field Dunaway • April 24, 2026
Suspect nursing home abuse? Avoid costly mistakes that can hurt your case. Learn what to do before it’s too late.
By Field Dunaway • April 13, 2026
How to recognize nursing home neglect and hold them accountable under S.C. law
February 25, 2026
Injured by a defective product? Learn your rights and when you may have a case. Speak with a product liability lawyer today.